CAPELLA AFEPCapella Agentic Full-Stack Engineering Platform for SAPAsk CAPELLA

Evidence / current qualification + historical case

Product proof, with the boundary attached.

Current release qualification and historical SAP outcome evidence are separate records. CAPELLA shows what each proves—and what it does not.

CURRENT RELEASE QUALIFICATIONRELEASED

CAPELLA AFEP 0.7.4

Released with 0 new regressions against the qualified baseline.

0.7.4 is a released product boundary. It records 0 new regressions against the qualified 0.7.4 baseline; historical and environment-dependent failures remain explicitly classified. The release promotion itself does not claim SAP/BTP activity.

Sourced9c02ef163c5ff0cfd2e7efcfdd20daa82dbfa57
Tagv0.7.4
ComponentsSFC 0.13.1 / A4Layer 1.0.0
0New regressions vs qualified baseline
FALSEHistorical suite fully green
0SAP/BTP activity during release
NOAuthority-model change
VERIFIEDCAPELLA AFEP 0.7.4 is RELEASED.Verify
Authority
Release provenance and website truth reconciliation
Source / provenance
d9c02ef163c5ff0cfd2e7efcfdd20daa82dbfa57
What proves this
The public product boundary is release 0.7.4 at tag v0.7.4.
What this does not prove
Post-release engineering main changes, including CI/CD and RTC hardening, are not automatically 0.7.4 release features.
Release boundary
RELEASED_PRODUCT
What would make this false?
release commit changed; tag provenance changed; post-release main were presented as original release
Inspect source
CASE 01VERIFIED

VERIFIED ENGINEERING CASE 01 / HISTORICAL

Managed RAP Creation

A validated managed RAP mission moved through SFC 0.13.1 qualification, explicit human authorization, A4Layer 1.0.0 execution, SAP realization, SAP readback and ATC with 0 findings.

Proven scope14-object bounded SAP realization
Historical runtime baselineCAPELLA 0.6.1 / SFC 0.13.1 / A4Layer 1.0.0
MissionCAPELLA_MULTI_OBJECT_NAMING_CORRECTED_LIVE_REALIZATION_R1

What was proven

  • SFC 0.13.1 qualification completed before authorization
  • Explicit human authorization remained hash-bound
  • A4Layer 1.0.0 carried bounded execution
  • SAP realized and returned the expected 14-object state
  • ATC completed with 0 findings and evidence was recorded

How it was proven

Qualified request, authorization record, SAP realization, readback, ATC and Observatory evidence.

Open mission evidence

What was not proven

Historical bounded evidence for the supported managed RAP create path. It does not claim unrestricted RAP delivery, a clean test environment, or a new SAP realization in CAPELLA AFEP 0.7.4.

Ask what was not proven
CASE 02CLAIM_SCOPED

VERIFIED ENGINEERING CASE 02 / CURRENT GENERATION

Governed FullStack deployment with platform-limited runtime

RAP-04 records a current-generation FullStack case where backend delivery and deployed content were verified, while runtime execution remained platform-blocked and was not represented as runtime-verified.

Proven scopeRAP-04 governed backend and Fiori delivery closure
MissionCAPELLA_AFEP_0_7_4_RAP04
RuntimePLATFORM_BLOCKED / not runtime verified
VERIFIEDBACKEND
VERIFIED_DEPLOYEDFIORI_DEPLOYMENT
8/8 VERIFIEDCONTENT
VERIFIEDSERVICE_ASSOCIATION
VERIFIEDAPPINDEX
PLATFORM_BLOCKEDRUNTIME
FALSERUNTIME_VERIFIED
PASS_WITH_PLATFORM_LIMITATIONMISSION_CLOSURE

What was proven

  • Backend truth reached BACKEND_VERIFIED.
  • Fiori deployment reconciliation reached VERIFIED_DEPLOYED.
  • Deployed content reached 8/8 VERIFIED.
  • Service association and AppIndex evidence were verified.
  • Runtime verification stayed false because the platform limitation was not bypassed.

How it was proven

Claim-specific backend, Fiori deployment, content, service association, AppIndex and runtime classification records.

Review runtime vocabulary

What was not proven

Runtime execution proof is not established. SAP registration or deployment verification is not treated as runtime verification.

Ask about PLATFORM_BLOCKED

Latest engineering-main evidence

CI/CD and RTC hardening support release readiness, not a release promotion.

Post-release engineering main includes merged RTC and CI/CD hardening while preserving the 0.7.4 public release boundary. It is engineering truth for release-management alignment, not a new product release.

VERIFIEDPost-0.7.4 engineering main establishes CI/CD and RTC hardening evidence, not a new release.Verify
Authority
Post-release engineering status review
Source / provenance
ddafca2597285a4c39818f69cb949c0d5dfb54e2
What proves this
Release-management evidence includes RTC convergence, signed-script governance and three-environment release-flow alignment.
What this does not prove
A new product release, a fresh SAP write, production promotion, a live mission completion or runtime proof.
Release boundary
POST_RELEASE_ENGINEERING_MAIN
What would make this false?
a new release supersedes 0.7.4; RTC evidence is contradicted; signed-script trust is bypassed; production promotion is claimed without production verification
Inspect source

Current release metrics

0.7.4 qualification, not a new SAP outcome.

0.7.4

Current release

RELEASED · tag v0.7.4

RTC

Latest engineering main

CI/CD and release-management evidence reviewed separately from the released product boundary

0

New regressions

Against the qualified 0.7.4 baseline

0.13.1

SFC

Current qualified component identity

1.0.0

A4Layer

Current qualified component identity

FALSE

Historical suite fully green

Historical and environment-dependent failures remain classified

0

SAP/BTP activity

During the 0.7.4 release promotion

Current limitations

Proof without overclaiming.

Claim state remains distinct from mission execution state.

  • 01CAPELLA AFEP 0.7.4 is RELEASED at tag v0.7.4 and release commit d9c02ef163c5ff0cfd2e7efcfdd20daa82dbfa57.
  • 02The 0.7.4 release records 0 new regressions against the qualified baseline; the historical suite is not represented as fully green.
  • 03The 0.7.4 release promotion itself did not perform SAP/BTP activity.
  • 04Post-0.7.4 CI/CD and RTC evidence is release-management hardening; it is not a new SAP outcome or production promotion.
  • 05RAP-04 evidence is claim-scoped: backend and deployment proof do not become runtime proof.
  • 06Agent, skill and MCP effectiveness are not measured as outcome-changing contribution.
  • 07Existing RAP modification and multi-environment qualification remain outside supported scope.

Continue verification

Inspect architecture authority or interrogate the case in context.